Cathy Has Returned

Cathy does sound good, been listening all afternoon and up till now....sometimes even forgetting it's a quasi...

The copper heatsinked beauty is up next for a G board
 

Attachments

  • 20200517_214028.jpg
    20200517_214028.jpg
    2.8 MB · Views: 29
Was thinking on ordering 2 of these, populate with a dozen caps and stick in a box next to a WOPL to around double the capacitance in the PS. Anything I should be aware of or ensure that I do other than don't get electrocuted?
 
As you increase the power supply capacitance, the on-time of the diodes in the bridge rectifier gets shorter and shorter, which increases the peak current that the diodes must conduct. I have no idea what the peak current demands are with the present power supply capacitance or even if it is approaching the specified maximum, but be aware of this going forward. What do you hope to improve by doubling the power supply capacitance?
 
BlueCrab said:
As you increase the power supply capacitance, the on-time of the diodes in the bridge rectifier gets shorter and shorter, which increases the peak current that the diodes must conduct. I have no idea what the peak current demands are with the present power supply capacitance or even if it is approaching the specified maximum, but be aware of this going forward. What do you hope to improve by doubling the power supply capacitance?
Click to expand...

Thanks for the heads up, I do believe the rectifier is quite the beefy one so I believe, dunno for certain, it will be fine.

Hope to stiffen the power supply and see the effect to the overall amp performance. Watt's output to PS capacitance ratio is quite low on these amps if you compare them to other hifi designs. I've seen preamps with much more than the PL's have. The small case is a big reason we are where we are I suppose. I have a feeling the amps would respond well to more power storage. We shall see!

If anyone has tried this already and can report about it would be much appreciated.
 
If you intend to use 4 terminal capacitors, that Chinese board appears to be laid out incorrectly. The 2 outriggers on electrolytic caps that have 4 pins specifically call out no connection to the 2 outrigger posts. They are for mechanical support only and must be isolated from both + and - poles.

If you are using 2 pin, 10mm spacing caps, they will work OK.
 
Yes, planning on using 2 pin, 10 mm spacing. Around 24k uF per board, 2 boards.
 
laatsch55 said:
Cathy does sound good, been listening all afternoon and up till now....sometimes even forgetting it's a quasi...

The copper heatsinked beauty is up next for a G board
Click to expand...
Chassis take an end shock Lee? Looks like a 400 chassis I just picked up recently.
 
One of those 400's I bought on ebay years ago for 100.00
 
Gepetto said:
160VDC caps in mind?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I originally was looking at 100V but then thought, why do what PL did? I will likely use it on 400 or 700 so will be good for both. While I have your attention Joe, can you think of a good 4 way connector I could use that would handle the amperage? It would be nice to be able to plug it in to the side/back of an amp. If I don't use a connector it will be hard wired, which is ok, but I move amps in and out more frequently than most.
 
That was referring to the 400 Scott...

Although Cathy was at risk also.
 
Gibsonian said:
Yeah, I originally was looking at 100V but then thought, why do what PL did? I will likely use it on 400 or 700 so will be good for both. While I have your attention Joe, can you think of a good 4 way connector I could use that would handle the amperage? It would be nice to be able to plug it in to the side/back of an amp. If I don't use a connector it will be hard wired, which is ok, but I move amps in and out more frequently than most.
Click to expand...


Amphenol..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top