WOPL Sniffer
Veteran and General Yakker
Happy Easter bro.... Don't eat too much.... I'm crashing too. We'll get Joe to comment hopefully.
Don't worry Perry, I have not even tried. I have to get the E-712s back out into the garage
If you've ever opened them up them you know the Panasonic Thrusters from the mini-consoles had two 16 ohm speakers in parallel for ~8 ohms.
Im Not worried about you bro.
Happy easter, call me one of these days.
Happy Easter Perry, I may give you a ring tonight or tomorrow. Just been under the weather and dealing with these Dr visits
Happy Easter bro.... Don't eat too much.... I'm crashing too. We'll get Joe to comment hopefully.
Hi Perry
What comment? This thread is a mile long in just 24 hours![]()
Just a comment about running 2 sets of speakers in parallel. I say it's asking for trouble for the average audio dude. Then me and Lee were discussing why the fluke reads 4 ohms at the speaker posts instead of 8. I said it's the difference between the meter (DC) and the MFG quoted rating (In AC)
Thanks Joe
P
The safe bet is to put them in series, you will do no harm except that the sound quality will suffer from the amp not being able to control the center node between the 2 series speakers. Damping factor seen at each speaker will suffer as well because of the impedance of the other speaker. You may end up with flabby bass, etc.
Speakers are reactive loads, not resistive loads. Each speaker has a motor in it, the voice coil within the magnetic field of the speaker magnet. Velocity of a motor produces back EMF, velocity is directly proportional to the voltage applied. This back EMF is seen in series with the DCR of the speaker to produce the reactance (higher than DCR) seen at the amplifier posts. In a few words, that is why a meter reading of a speaker is not the true impedance listed on a speaker nameplate.
Happy Easter all!
Not even what we are talking about.

What are they Fred?