As far as levity goes, I think everyone needs to feel inclusive in their own way. For me I don't think writing mocking poetic verse about a member of the community is something that I could pull off without being offensive. But hey that's just me.
I didn't think he was mocking anyone in particular, but rather the overall mindset of audiophilia. I believe he was saying that one cannot just buy their way to sonic nirvana, and we all sometimes get caught up in the prestige of owning certain pieces of gear. I know I do, and I regularly mock myself for it to the people I know. It's a phase linear thing, you wouldn't understand.
(Maybe
you would- I don't know your system.)
I can't speak for Orange, and maybe I'm totally off base here, but that's how I interpreted it. Divorced from this specific situation, it's still a nice piece of verse.
We need to look at what matters in audio reproduction. #1 on my list is flat on axis/ in room frequency response with a strong emphasis on the first arrival- i.e. less excitation of the room, which leads to emphasis of late arrival sound. This means a more tightly controlled directivity pattern for the speaker. If your system does not seek to provide fairly flat response, you're sunk from the start. 901's will have a larger sound-stage, but less pinpoint image due to the type of speaker they are (very wide dispertion), and this itself will seriously color what you are hearing, even with a flat in room response, which is unlikely since they bring the room (with all of it's problems) into the picture more strongly. They would not be my choice of speaker, but again- it's a hobby. It doesn't have to make sense to
anybody (constitution on the head of a pin anyone?), much less people other than yourself. My advice would be to take some measurements at the listening position and worry about sources after that, then pre's and amps.
Zach