Fortunately I have the caps on hand, good audio grade, Muse and ECW. They fit nicely with a little lead bending after enlarging the through holes for the leads.
Going to put it in the main system and burn it in.
I'll measure it this evening and post the results.
Listening to Iron Butterfly. I really enjoy their first two albums, especially the first, Heavy.
Distorted square wave, 400 mVpp, 1 kHz input.
Double checked the test equipment by swapping in the digital scope, generator, and cables.
Double checked all preamp settings.
Results are factual.
Now going to sweep it with the QA403.
I'm thinking I'll see a low frequency bump.
I'll also post a 20 kHz photo.
Distorted square wave, 400 mVpp, 1 kHz input.
Double checked the test equipment by swapping in the digital scope, generator, and cables.
Double checked all preamp settings.
Results are factual.
Now going to sweep it with the QA403.
I'm thinking I'll see a low frequency bump.
I'll also post a 20 kHz photo.
Yup, it's correct, although I do have a 7 pF in C18, C20, better than the 15 pF above 30 kHz.
C18, C20 7pF
C42, C43 100 uF
C21, C22 2.2 uF
Going to open up the bottom and inspect the foil side just because.
Ahh, just saw your schematic. There's the issue.
This is a Series 2.
On your schematic photo, just above C42 is R71, a 16K
The S2 uses a 7.5K for R71. All the other values look the same.
Going to take the dog for a walk.
Joe, no problem having this tore down on the bench, this is a test unit I'm using to learn with.
No problem.
Take some time to think about the issue.
I carefully removed the old caps and can easily reinstall them. Nothing to it.
In the meantime I'll carefully measure all the components in that circuit to ensure they're correct.
Something else I wanted to do was measure DC before those 4.7 uF output caps and see what frequency response is with them bypassed.
After sleeping on it, perhaps I'm driving the opamps to distortion levels due to using stepped attenuators for volume and balance controls.
I'll look at that later today.
I constructed the balance attenuator with no resistance at all in the centered position.
Perhaps I need to add resistance at the balance attenuators input tap.
I'll really look at the unit closely with the scope and figure this out.
No difference with jumper across the 0.22 uF at C21 and C22.
Now going to jumper across the 100 uF at C42 and C43.
In the past, I've found the C42+43 values to be quite sensitive. Tried some 10 uF films there in place of the original 10 uF electrolytics. Sine waves looked good, but audio was degraded somewhat.
This was before I read about square wave testing. Shame, because the fit so well.
No difference with jumper across the 0.22 uF at C21 and C22.
Now going to jumper across the 100 uF at C42 and C43.
In the past, I've found the C42+43 values to be quite sensitive. Tried some 10 uF films there in place of the original 10 uF electrolytics. Sine waves looked good, but audio was degraded somewhat.
This was before I read about square wave testing. Shame, because the fit so well.
Joe, I'm soooo embarrassed.
Rule #1 for square wave testing is DC coupling at the scope.
I've had it set for 50 ohm coupling.
Yes, I broke your rule #1.
And I looked at it several times and didn't see it.
Damn. Starting over, pulling the jumpers and retesting the new caps.
Joe, I'm soooo embarrassed.
Rule #1 for square wave testing is DC coupling at the scope.
I've had it set for 50 ohm coupling.
Yes, I broke your rule #1.
And I looked at it several times and didn't see it.
Damn. Starting over, pulling the jumpers and retesting the new caps.
Well thanks, but I need challenged as I don't have the background for this, I'm more of a mechanic.
Have very nice square waves at 1 kHz.
Here's 20 kHz. Looks good compared to what I've seen on other sites.
Going to be a couple hours or so until I can generate a FR, need to do a few things for the wife, then I can get back to it.
Thanks Joe!