........I believe the logic behind using headphones for amp design/evaluation is to:
1. Isolate your ears from the listening environment, so you can only hear the amp.
2. Evaluate the noise floor of the circuitry.
3. Listen for any type of audible distortion at low levels that may be indicative of problems at higher power levels/frequencies.
4. Since head phones are usually just a single diaphragm, there are no passive crossover artifacts to contaminate the signal from the amp under evaluation.
Nick,
Well said!
Your explanation of some of the variables one is trying to isolate is what I meant to say in better detail.
In one of my prior posts on this thread, I didn't mean to infer that testing at 1W with headphones was the only tool in a designer's toolbox. However it may be a starting point that we may all may more easily duplicate. To be sure, I am willing to bet the designer’s perform objective testing with measurement and test equipment as well as subjective testing with their own preferred loudspeakers, music, etc.
In order for us to do subjective testing (listening tests), I had suggested that we might also obtain Mr. Holt's book "The Audio Glossary". In his book, he has terms and definitions for those subjective words audio reviewers like to use when performing listening tests. I suggested this so that we could more effectively communicate to each other by using the same terms and definitions. Otherwise, when someone says something sounds a particular we may not understand one another. (Lawyers love it when we pay them to argue over what a term in a contract means like the word "reasonable" in a home lease agreement).
I am just trying to get us all closer to one another in the words we use when we perform our appraisals. In this case, how an amplifier sounds.
Golden ears unite!
Ed