Phase Linear 400 Amplifier Upgrade to WOPL

NavLinear

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
6,059
Location
SoCal
Some photos of the White Oak controller board installed using Mil-Spec wire. The new bias transistors with the latest bias tranny bracket made from polycarbonate installed. Just need some monkey cum for heat transfer and clean up of the solder splatters and flux residue. I will be doing one last inspection of all components on the board 'cause I'm anal but that is a symptom of a greater problem.


DSC_0026.jpg DSC_0027.jpg DSC_0028.jpg DSC_0029.jpg DSC_0030.jpg
 

mlucitt

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
3,494
Location
Jacksonville, FL
Dennis your soldering skills are very good. I saw that you connected the ground to the 5L connection and it also appears you used the ground link on the back of the board to connect 5L to 5R. It is redundant but I don't know if it will cause any issues with a possible ground loop. Probably because the lengths are short, there will be no effect at all. Did you take both 5L and 5R to the Star common ground point between the capacitors?
 

NavLinear

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
6,059
Location
SoCal
Dennis your soldering skills are very good. I saw that you connected the ground to the 5L connection and it also appears you used the ground link on the back of the board to connect 5L to 5R. It is redundant but I don't know if it will cause any issues with a possible ground loop. Probably because the lengths are short, there will be no effect at all. Did you take both 5L and 5R to the Star common ground point between the capacitors?
Thanks Mark.

I was going to ask that very question about the ground jumper between the two channels. It seems that it should be removed as I did route both 5L and 5R to the buss bar.

The grounding changes I made are based on what I've read here and that is greatly appreciated. The RCA jack grounds now float relative to the chassis with the buss wire removed between the copper ground plate to the bannana jack ground output. 5L and 5R are tied to the star ground point.

I noticed on your drawing (very nice work by the way) that there are some capacitors across the diodes of the bridge rectifer. I would assume this is to minimize undesired higher frequency components. What type of caps do you recommend and do you know a good source for these?

I need to go back over the drawings as I know I will have a couple additional questions for y'all.
 

laatsch55

Administrator,
Staff member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
74,912
Location
Gillette, Wyo.
Tagline
Halfbiass...Electron Herder and Backass Woof
Very neat, very tidy, very professional. It takes a hand to replace all the wiring from the board to the backplane and have it look better than factory!! Excellent!!
 

NavLinear

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
6,059
Location
SoCal
Very neat, very tidy, very professional. It takes a hand to replace all the wiring from the board to the backplane and have it look better than factory!! Excellent!!
Thanks Lee - I'll be doing some more with the wiring but not before I verify all of my connections and components and then some electrical testing. Thanks for all your inputs - it helps a bunch.
 

laatsch55

Administrator,
Staff member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
74,912
Location
Gillette, Wyo.
Tagline
Halfbiass...Electron Herder and Backass Woof
Dennis, this was just posted on AK. Is this in your area of expertise??


[HR][/HR]A little bit of an offbeat request, which I'm hoping a wire chaser might be able to help with:

My company is looking for a wireless solution to communicate between a 737, a tug operator, and the tower. We've looked into commercial solutions, but all of them require a backpack sized base station, as they are meant to link multiple wireless headsets, and none seem to be able to communicate on two different frequencies (to select either the tower or the tug operator, and be able to monitor both).

What I would like to do is use the mic/speakers in the flight deck, with a battery powered wireless "box/transceiver" plugged into the ground maintenance jack/service interphone meant for a headset on the outside of the aircraft fuselage.

The tug would then have another wireless box which was on the same frequency as the first, along with an audio amp and a place to plug their headset into. Standard, unpowered headset/mics would be used in the tug.

Right now, a long extension cable is running from the service interphone jack, directly to the tug operator's headset. Despite this extension being robust, expensive, and full of strain-relief, the constant movement and vibration consistently kills solder joints at the connectors.

My GoogleFu was unable to find a ready-built solution. What i need is essentially a wireless version of the above extension cord which can receive and transmit audio on a frequency not used in aircraft communications (i.e. okay to use according to the FCC). Does anyone have any ideas as to how such a system could be created? The aircraft will be in tow with the APU running, so the flight deck mics and speakers will be energized.
__________________
Dual 1019/Grado F1+, Sony PS1, Knight KN-775, Advent Legacy
 

laatsch55

Administrator,
Staff member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
74,912
Location
Gillette, Wyo.
Tagline
Halfbiass...Electron Herder and Backass Woof
His last post-----

can find transmitters and receivers all day, but no transceivers (don't need duplex, neither!).

We tow aircraft across the field from our ramp to the terminal, and our brake rider communicates directly with the tower, but also confirms with the tug operator, who in turn communicates back to the brake rider. I guess two transmitters and receivers could be purchased which could then be wired into one box, one jack...

I was only singling out avionics guys as they might have something in mind even a dumb airframes guy could concoct. __________________
Dual 1019/Grado F1+, Sony PS1, Knight KN-775, Advent Legacy
 

mlucitt

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
3,494
Location
Jacksonville, FL
I would look at the AT&T Push To Talk (PTT) software defined radios (cellphones) with earplug that would fit inside a set of muffs and a boom mike or a throat mike. I would not think it would be to hard to combine the phone jack with the mike/speaker wiring. You could also invest in some base chargers to keep the phones ready to go, the newer batteries do not suffer from memory like the old batteries did.
 

NavLinear

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
6,059
Location
SoCal
Great idea Mark! My experience is with one or two person aircraft and we hook up directly to the plane for comm - unless of course the plane is in the air than we'll use other means.
 

mlucitt

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
3,494
Location
Jacksonville, FL
We use a PTT out on the water for sailboat racing and spotter boat coordination in the summer, works great with the phones clipped to the lapel of the lifejacket.
 

Pure_Brew

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
1,942
Location
New England
Tagline
Coffee filters
I might be way off the mark but doesn't Nextel work this way? Or is it more of an issue because you need more then one person to hear you when you push to talk?
 
Top