WOPL Sniffer
Veteran and General Yakker
They would be my second choice.... I REALLY wanted the JBL 250ti's
They would be my second choice.... I REALLY wanted the JBL 250ti's
Bigger is Better ! You have the juice to run these properly, room shaking even using my Nikko Alpha II.I was scoping out some JBL L100's and then I saw they only handle 50 Watts?????? SCREW THAT.
Bigger is Better ! You have the juice to run these properly, room shaking even using my Nikko Alpha II.
https://stereonomono.blogspot.com/2012/04/jbl-l-150-1979.html
From my L100 owners manual it says the recommended amplifier is 150wpc continuous. JBL was very conservative back in the day. The 50W was likely a reference to a 50W RMS continuous test tone at 1KHz (hard on the midrange which kicks in at 500Hz). With the excellent JBL crossovers, I doubt you can damage a L100 with anything less than 250W peak musical power, and by then your ears would be bleeding. This is assuming a quality amp like a Phase Linear, if the amp is clipping, the speakers should be de-rated to a power level below the clipping threshold.I was scoping out some JBL L100's and then I saw they only handle 50 Watts?????? SCREW THAT.
Yes, your are correct, the early L100 crossovers were well-designed and gave the speakers their initial popularity. Later, the cost-cutting arm of Harmon attacked the JBL speakers and the result was a L100 crossover that sounded good when the the volume was loud but sort of muddy when the volume was lowered. So buy the vintage L100 with the N112 (I think) crossovers. See what I mean:L100 crossovers are not identical. I had to look into them recently.
The crossovers I was asked to repair were really basic. Just a 3uF capacitor and a 6uF plus a couple of L-pads. The woofer runs as a full range. I think the speaker model was designated L100-A.
Looking good either way, how they sounding?