Don't want to go that extreme.. ears'll hurt first.
Guess what drivers I just put in, with NO problems?? I figured it'll work or it won't so what the heck. I like the sound of the 15024's with the 21194's instead of the 410's - Just seems clearer to me.
meters still fubard... I'll take another stab at those another day.
Don't want to go that extreme.. ears'll hurt first.
Guess what drivers I just put in, with NO problems?? I figured it'll work or it won't so what the heck. I like the sound of the 15024's with the 21194's instead of the 410's - Just seems clearer to me.
meters still fubard... I'll take another stab at those another day.
Check for oscillation on the lower half Jer, you will not hear it but you can see it on the scope. That is a risky combination, 2 poles at the same frequency in that configuration. The oscillation will be in the high 100s of KHz range and may break out sporadically.
Check for oscillation on the lower half Jer, you will not hear it but you can see it on the scope. That is a risky combination, 2 poles at the same frequency in that configuration. The oscillation will be in the high 100s of KHz range and may break out sporadically.
2 transistors with identical Ft contributing to the phase lag rolling off the gain in the lower local feedback loop...
Q7 derives feedback from Q12 and Q14/16/18
You won't see it on a signal that big Jer. If it materializes, you will see it on a signal of a volt or 2. A square wave input will show it up as ringing on the negative half
You won't see it on a signal that big Jer. If it materializes, you will see it on a signal of a volt or 2. A square wave input will show it up as ringing on the negative half
Thanks. Well I didn't see so much ringing as I did overshoot, and it was definitely better on the 700 so it's not the input signal. But the overshoot is on both halves.. nothing different on the negative half, Joe.
I'll get the 410's back in and see what difference there is. What else besides the 410's can I use that won't cause this?