NAD 6300

J!m

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
10,983
Location
Connecticut
Tagline
BOT
#41
I never used any noise reduction beyond DBX which is actually "dynamic expansion" or whatever marketing called it- that did not depend on the original recording conditions.

But with Dolby NR, yes, the same decoding must be used to match the encoding of when the recording was made. Basically a compression that is decompressed on playback, to "preserve" the high frequencies. I never liked recording or playback with it.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2022
Messages
360
Location
East Coast
#42
I never used any noise reduction beyond DBX which is actually "dynamic expansion" or whatever marketing called it- that did not depend on the original recording conditions.

But with Dolby NR, yes, the same decoding must be used to match the encoding of when the recording was made. Basically a compression that is decompressed on playback, to "preserve" the high frequencies. I never liked recording or playback with it.
yeah you’re right if you don’t use it once you record with it it just doesn’t sound correct.

I’m thinking the 6300 works a little different because of the DynEQ, but the manual tells you to engage Dolby when recording, or maybe I’m reading it wrong and it just means engaged Dolby C when you’re setting the recording level and the bias.
 

Elite-ist

Administrator, (and straight-up pimp stick!)
Staff member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
9,939
#44
Using Dolby C and switching on the MPX filter was recommended during the bias fine tune process to assist in hearing any reponse errors caused by over or under-biasing.

It was a long time since I used my NAD 6300 for recording, but most likely I used Dolby C with ferric cassettes..

Nando.
 
Top