PL2000 S2 Balance pot.

marcok

Chief Journeyman
Joined
Jun 9, 2014
Messages
1,052
Location
Milan Italy
Tagline
I'm very curious about any tech item
#41
A question related to PL 4000 series 1 .
The volume pot is a 100k linear with a 39k across center and ground to
have a log pot . But the pot is not connected directly to ground but via a 56 Ohm resistor .
Why ? What's the reason ? Never seen in other applications .
Ciao
Marco
 

Gepetto

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
13,927
Location
Sterling, MA
Tagline
Old 'Arn Enthusiast
#42
A question related to PL 4000 series 1 .
The volume pot is a 100k linear with a 39k across center and ground to
have a log pot . But the pot is not connected directly to ground but via a 56 Ohm resistor .
Why ? What's the reason ? Never seen in other applications .
Ciao
Marco
Nothing in the circuit that is obvious that would drive the need for it.
 

George S.

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Messages
5,019
#43
You replaced a dual log pot with a single linear pot correct? Did you measure in ohms where each pot measured to its ground terminal when the knob was centered on the original pot?
Correct, had 3 of them. 100k single gang. All measured very close to 98k ( and change) total resistance. With wiper very precisely centered, 49k (and change) from wiper to each leg. Amazingly accurate for such a cheap pot.
Took extreme care to cut the shaft to "D" shape at correct clock position.
Nothing on the board needed changed that I could see, just jumpers put across each channels solder pads with the pot legs to the channel jumpers and wiper grounded. So I decided no need for "jumpers" if I wired it as in photo. I maintained the correct wire colors.
On the dual channel scope, each channels wave form aligns over the other perfectly at 12:00, fades equally, gains or diminishes equally with volume.
I'm very satisfied with the results.
 

George S.

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Messages
5,019
#44
Oh, and the original dual gang is clearly logarithmic. The new single gang Bourne's is linear. The linear works fine, I think better. Better as in one has a finer ability to adjust the balance out near the pots limits.
 

Gepetto

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
13,927
Location
Sterling, MA
Tagline
Old 'Arn Enthusiast
#45
Oh, and the original dual gang is clearly logarithmic. The new single gang Bourne's is linear. The linear works fine, I think better. Better as in one has a finer ability to adjust the balance out near the pots limits.
The likelihood that positional matching between 2 ganged log pots has to be much smaller than a linear pot is.
 

George S.

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Messages
5,019
#46
I agree, when I plotted the values on the two gang there was a clear clocking discrepancy between the two gangs. A single gang eliminates that potential issue.
 
Top