George P bought a 400 and 700 board back in February. He also asked for a couple of the chips used in the 400 board and I threw them in N.C. I think I sent him the 400 schematic. I figured he was doing some research.
When I developed the 400 board about 15 years ago I didn't intend to do the 700. Compared to the 400, there weren't that many 700's out there. Gibsonian hit me up a couple times for a 700 board as he had a bunch of 700B's. I didn't feel comfortable trying to take the 400 design from 80 volts DC to the 700's 100 volts DC for safety reasons. 100 VDC is no laughing matter.
My 700 board is very different than my 400 board. I designed the 400 from scratch. The 700 is the exact same circuit used in the 200, 300, 500, and the Carver C500 with one exception. I use a "form C" relay in both boards.
Relay contacts come in 3 common configurations. The "normal" state is de-energized or shelf state. A form "A" contact is normally open (ANO). it is closed when the amp is turned on. A form "B" contact is normally closed (BNC). It's contact is open when the amp is on. A form "C" contact has a common terminal and one ANO and one BNC. Phase Linear used a form A (normally open).
I use a Form C contact on each channel. Here's why. The common failure mode of an amp is to dump 80-100 VDC into the speaker. A circuit detects DC and tells the relay to open. When the relay tries to open, there is high current flowing through the contacts and the contacts arc. With DC, the arcing welds the contacts. The form C relay uses the normally closed contact to short out (crowbar) the speaker . The relay could fail but that's ok if it protects the speaker.
So why didn't P/L use form C relays? They probably cost more. Look at any amp or receiver and you find a form A contact. When the amp fails the contacts weld and the speaker is still damaged. I have a relay on my bench from a Marantz 140 with welded contacts.
George is right about the relatively high DC trip level of my 700 board. Ed pointed that out in a post here at least 5 years ago. Despite that, I opted to go with the P/L design for the 700 board because I liked the discrete circuit for the higher voltage and P/L and Carver both used it. They had to have a good reason and I don't think it was purely lowest cost. I didn't second guess it.
Early on Perry bought some of my blank 700 boards for his amps. Later he designed his version of my 700 board. We know he's built a lot of amps and I assume he puts one in each amp he builds. It's the black one in the photo next to my green 700 board. Same relays, same circuit. He opted to crowbar the output of the amp rather than the speaker. That was a head scratcher. Took me a while to figure that out.
George's 700 version looks like he laid it out very similar to my 400 board. The right and left amp input Phoenix connectors has an unused pin in the middle. I was concerned that people would not twist the stranded wire from the amp good enough resulting in the output being shorted. The extra spacing makes it almost impossible make a mistake.
It looks like George uses surface mount resistors which allows him to get the extra power supply circuits on a small board.
View attachment 74957