Just wanted to say, I installed two a the 6d2-22 on secondaries before the bridge rectifier in the PL and no external inrush current box needed any more.
Caps and transformer should last a lot longer .
In my research if found Rod Elliot doesn’t like that stand alone idea at all he says
“ Many people like the idea of using NTC (negative temperature coefficient) thermistors for inrush limiting, with a common claim being that no additional circuitry is needed. For any product that does not draw consistent high power at all times, in a word, don't. Controversial? Not really - just because they are used by a number of major manufacturers doesn't always mean they'll be alright. If used in a switched system as described here, they are safe and reliable, but I have personally seen (yes, with my very own eyes) NTC thermistors explode mightily if there is a fault. Resistors can also fail, but the failure is (usually) contained - there are exceptions of course. In general, NTC thermistors are designed for very high peak current, but as noted earlier, you will see many different ways to describe the same thing, with almost no commonality between makers. To be genuinely useful, thermistors must be bypassed after the inrush event has ended.
You may enjoy Reading his tread on the subject I value a lot what he has amalgamated on his web site. Not everything is in line with my ideas but most is.
https://sound-au.com/articles/soft-start.htm