PL400 Series 2 problems...maybe

TrialByFire01

New Around These Parts
Joined
Aug 23, 2023
Messages
11
#1
Hi all, Appologies in advance for the long winded post but I'm having trouble (or I think I am) with 2 PL 400 Series 2 amplifiers. I have 2 of them and they are both acting differently when I bring them up on a variac. Both had shorted output transistors (caused by apparent over tightening of the outputs and cutting through the Silipads) and both were replaced with MJ21195’s and the remaining good RCA driver transistors were left in the 2nd and 4th positions(from the transformer).One of the 400’s is an earlier production Serial # in the 24000 range and the other is in the 29000 range.

When going through the start up procedure The 29000 ser. amp doesn’t begin outputting a sine wave until around 55 VAC on the variac whereas the earlier production does at around 30 VAC as outlined in the start up procedures posted online. This is the same with or without the output transistors installed. I have replaced Q 101,105-201,205 on the PL36 board as well as the two Zener diodes and all the electrolytic caps. I have also tried new bias transistors with zero difference.
With no output devices installed I have equal clipping with 1 kz sine wave once I get to 12vpp input on both channels(both amplifiers also). When I install the output transistors I still have nothing in the way of signal output until I reach around 55 VAC on the variac but it does seem to operate correctly at that point, it seems to draw a lot of current until the signal starts whereas the earlier production amp does not.

I have 3 amp fuses in the power supplies of both and I brought this amp up to 120 VAC and have good sine wave at the outputs and once I get past around 60-65 V on the variac the DC offset settles in at 5mv and 3mv. The thing that concerns me is the difference in the start-up voltage and the Idle current also sets up differently on both amplifiers as well. On the Earlier production amp the idle current isn’t adjustable down to 350mv via reading the voltage drop across R128 and R130 but I can adjust it from 0 past 8mv on the emitter resistors(.33 ohm) to achieve 25ma as stated in the online start up procedure but on the newer production amp I can achieve 350mv across R128 and R130 which does not allow me to achieve 25ma or 8mv across the emitter resistors, it's .00 untill Signal and volume turned up otherwise I would have to get to about 500mv across R128 and R130 get there.

My question is… Is this just a difference in the production time between the two amp’s or do I have a problem? I've never had two different production runs side by side before. They are clearly different but are both PL36 boards. The older amp has the LF356 and the newer one has the LF351 IC’s. If I remember correctly these draw more current than the LF356?


Both of these 400’s can be run at to at least 100W power into 8 Ohm speaker loads with no problems or clipping read at the speaker loads and draw 2.5 amps AC. They both have almost zero DC offset , 6mv or less. Any help or advice on this would be greatly appreciated.
 

laatsch55

Administrator,
Staff member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
74,829
Location
Gillette, Wyo.
Tagline
Halfbiass...Electron Herder and Backass Woof
#4
Forget the variac voltage , what's the rail voltage when the amp comes into regulation?
 

TrialByFire01

New Around These Parts
Joined
Aug 23, 2023
Messages
11
#5
Nope not full complement, I just fat fingered the number. They are quasi and MJ21196G. the rail voltage is approx 83.5V and the same negative.with no AC ripple.
 

mlucitt

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
3,469
Location
Jacksonville, FL
#6
These Phase Linear amplifiers are designed to be switched on with at least 117VAC. We only use the Variac as a testing device when the status of the amplifier is unknown or it has been many years since the amplifier has been turned on.
The "Turn On voltage" is not a specified value and could be determined by a number of factors. Your main issue right now is to remove the PL36 control boards and replace them with White Oak Audio Rev G1 "Dual Mono" Control Boards. Not only is the quality of audio improved, but the amplifier will be more reliable and stable.

Of course, you have already replaced the original Power Supply Capacitors, right? Those large electrolytic capacitors have a useful life of 25-30 years and if yours are original, they are past due for failure and it is not pretty when it happens.
 

TrialByFire01

New Around These Parts
Joined
Aug 23, 2023
Messages
11
#9
These aren't my amplifiers I'm fixing them for a friend and he does not want to do the WOPL. These will both work fine when just plugged into full AC so my only remaining question is... does it really matter if the idle current sets up differently on these two production runs? So to recap..the older one does not go down to 350mv at R128-130 where it is refrenced in the service manual but I can set it for 25ma/8mv across the emitter resistors and has full range to take it down to 0mv and past 20mv s the circuit seems to be working fine. The newer one works like it "should" by setting R128-130 to 350mv but at that point doesn't show 25ma or 8mv drop across the emitter resistors unless I take it up to about 450-500mv on R128-130. Am I missing something "special" in this circuit or will the bias be the bias and should only be measured by the emitter resistors?
 

mlucitt

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
3,469
Location
Jacksonville, FL
#10
Your friend's amplifier has tired Bias Transistors. These are 2N3403 devices affixed to the inside back of the chassis and are use to vary the Bias voltage of the amplifier by using the heat characteristics of a transistor. This keeps the amplifier from "thermal runaway", rather, just inaccurate Bias as the amplifier warms up.
This issue will continue to deteriorate due to the age of the components.
We use new 2N5088 Bias Transistors for our upgrades because these transistors heat track a more efficiently.

Your friend does not have to do the "Full WOPL", many customers just purchase a new WOA Rev G1 Dual Mono Control Board Kit for $160 or have someone assemble, clean, and test the new Control Board for $375.00. The difference is sound quality is huge, stereo separation doubles, and reliability is dramatically improved. Typical DC Offset measured at the Speaker Terminals is 2mV or less and the Bias is adjustable and rock solid at 350mV for both channels. The biggest advantage, and you will understand this, is that there are no capacitors in the audio sound path. This guarantees the quality of the audio will not vary of time as there are no capacitors to be affected by heat, humidity, air pressure, or vibration.
 

TrialByFire01

New Around These Parts
Joined
Aug 23, 2023
Messages
11
#13
I understand all of that with the bias transistors. I swapped them out with 2N222a's temporarily with absolutely no effect, same same. I realize those are not exact matches but one would expect even a slight change in behavior by doing that...no? As stated in my original post I have between 3mv and 5mv DC offset on both amplifiers, I think that is well within spec. I don't know how to say this any clearer, he does not want to do the WO upgrades.
 

WOPL Sniffer

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
11,522
Location
Minnie-Soda
Tagline
Screw it
#14
I understand all of that with the bias transistors. I swapped them out with 2N222a's temporarily with absolutely no effect, same same. I realize those are not exact matches but one would expect even a slight change in behavior by doing that...no? As stated in my original post I have between 3mv and 5mv DC offset on both amplifiers, I think that is well within spec. I don't know how to say this any clearer, he does not want to do the WO upgrades.
Are your amps working right now?
 

WOPL Sniffer

Veteran and General Yakker
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
11,522
Location
Minnie-Soda
Tagline
Screw it
#18
We have had many members fix these with varying degrees of success. Some are still alive, some lasted for a couple hours. You never know.
 

TrialByFire01

New Around These Parts
Joined
Aug 23, 2023
Messages
11
#19
So are you saying that you don't know if the Idle current can simply be referenced off of the emitter resistors reliably?
 
Top