- Joined
- May 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,321
- Location
- Southwest Kootenays BC
- Tagline
- No such things as bad days, just bad moments
i was told that it was better to monoamp 2 200 series than dh500...by and old dynaco and hafler engineer...but dont know enough to know which ones nor how they are modified to monoamp..
maybe there is info here???
congrstulation!!!
do you like hafler gear??
maybe there is info here???
congrstulation!!!
do you like hafler gear??
For sound quality? Short answer is yes.
That DH101 is the only piece of Hafler gear I still own. It was included for free with a NAD 2100 that I bought off Craigslist for $75. I wasn't really interested in the pre-amp but did not refuse it. This was all before learning of this Pheonix forum and back then I was using from time to time a Hafler DH220. That cost $125 and was "modified" by the seller's brother so as to power some Magnepan's better than if it was stock. Or so the story went.
In any case, the DH220 never missed a beat and in all honesty, I could have (should have) been happy enough with it and logically, there was no practical reason to change. But when my 700B got WOPL-ized, I saw no point in hanging on to the DH220 so it went with a bundle of gear as an even trade for a Sony TA2000 pre-amp. Included in that bundle was another Hafler piece, a DH110 preamp.
In general, I respect Hafler gear but of the three pieces, which I owned simultaneously, I liked the DH110 the least. I thought the DH220 was a really good amplifier and I should not have disposed of it on whim.
I keep the DH101 because of what the parts cost and all the time I spent refurbishing it over the years. I have far more into it than what it is worth as a working unit. It's quirky because it's so cheaply constructed but is somewhat iconic.
After having been inside those three Hafler items, something I found appealing was that they were not crowded internally so relatively easy to work on.